Billy Beane is NOT a genius.
Billy Beane is not a genius. It is as simple as that. I can't tell you how many times I've heard, "well if they just followed the genius of Billy Beane we would have more runs, more this, more that." It's become something I constantly roll my eyes to. The fact is Billy Beane is NOT a genius. Sure, Moneyball is a great book - but let me ask you the following questions:
1. How many championships have the A's won using following such a formula?
2. How did the A's do last year?
3. Have the A's even been true consistent contenders up there with the Twins, Sox, Yanks, and Angels?
The answers:
1. 0
2. Terrible after getting rid of their pitching staff that had, by luck, fallen into Billy Beane's hands - too good to be true... but yes he did it... he traded them away... get over it A's fans.
3. Pretty much NOT
Why is it that Billy Beane is called a genius? Because he looks at OBP (on base percentage)? Don't we ALL look at OBP? If you played up growing ball: did you not constantly hear "a walk is as good as a hit."??? I know I did. So right here and now I would like to say: my little league coaches - geniuses, my JV coaches - geniuses, my summer league coaches - geniuses, me (as a coach) - genius.
In fact, we can all be geniuses if we agree that getting on base is what is important in baseball.
"But, but, but he says more than that"
I don't care. Billy Beane is overrated and his ideas are too stuck in statistics that he misses on field reality and the importance of team chemistry and in the idiosyncrasies of the best teams in baseball.
It really is as simple as this: Billy Beane has a system where he looks at statistics. All managers have a system where they look at statistics. Billy Beane is not a genius.
Come on say it with me: Billy Beane has a system where he looks at statistics. All managers have a system where they look at statistics. Billy Beane is not a genius.
At least not any more of a genius than my coaches were, or I am.